Topic 1 - Evaluation practices in STEM teaching

Back to Home

For the first Community of Practice, the theme of "Evaluation of STEM teaching" will be discussed. After reviewing some of the latest studies on the teaching situation in Europe it was noted that one of the key findings in the 2013 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) was that, while for more than half of the EU teachers feedback can have a positive impact on their teaching practices, on their public recognition and on their job satisfaction (apart from helping increase their motivation and confidence), most teachers still consider the feedback received is only used to deal with administrative requests. Moreover, they also believe that the existing systems of teacher appraisal and feedback have limited effect on teachers and on their teaching routines.

Indeed, this is quite a big concern as it can hinder teachers' performance and decrease students' academic outcomes. And it is no less relevant when it comes to STEM education. In fact, the pyramidal structure of most science disciplines makes it essential to ensure quality training in initial education.

There are different ways to evaluate STEM teaching practices. Some are focused on student outcomes, like students pre- and post-testing or like longitudinal assessments of student learning (that will determine in what manner a pre-requisite class trained students for a future class). Student satisfaction surveys are yet another evaluation method -although not widespread- as they remain quite limited in providing evidence on student learning outcomes.

Others review techniques directly address teachers. These can include peer observation (and feedback) in the classroom or rubric-based teaching assessment (understood as a scoring guide with systematized responses containing several evaluation criteria) or even a combination of both.

Evaluations can also be carried out internally (that is, from within the teachers' place of work) or externally (usually in a standardized way and carried out by regional or national authorities). These can include external review of the teaching materials used or even assessment of teaching portfolios.

Open questions

  1. Are there any evaluation practices carried out in your country/school, at the moment? Of what kind? By whom?
  2. As a teacher, have you ever been formally or informally evaluated? Tell us your experience and your impressions on the process.
  3. In your opinion, which evaluation methods are more efficient or effective?
  4. Case scenario: Peer learning is one of the most common assessment methodologies for STEM education. What practices would you implement in your school to create learning spaces that foster a culture of peer-based assessment?
« Tagasi

Which evaluation methods are more efficient or effective?

Kombineeritud vaade Flat View Puustruktuuri vaade
Teemad [ eelmine | järgmine ]
toggle
Which evaluation methods are more efficient or effective? Radostina Karageorgieva 22.04.16 18:35
RE: Which evaluation methods are more efficient or effective? Anonüümne 26.04.16 20:03
RE: Which evaluation methods are more efficient or effective? Elif Adibelli Şahin 27.04.16 9:40
RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef Anonüümne 28.03.17 7:59
RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef Anonüümne 15.04.17 13:18
RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef Anonüümne 24.04.17 0:52
RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef Anonüümne 29.04.17 23:50
RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef Anonüümne 2.05.17 4:10
RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef Anonüümne 21.05.17 5:09
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 30.05.17 19:31
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 4.06.17 12:13
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 6.06.17 23:26
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 12.06.17 2:40
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 14.06.17 1:54
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 15.06.17 10:46
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 19.06.17 0:16
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 23.06.17 20:18
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 25.06.17 19:00
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 25.06.17 23:44
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 29.06.17 20:25
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 2.07.17 20:47
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 10.07.17 13:04
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 13.07.17 1:41
RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&# Anonüümne 16.07.17 17:00
RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef Anonüümne 21.06.17 4:55
RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef Anonüümne 10.08.17 16:37
RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef Anonüümne 11.08.17 22:55
Share your thoughts on this topic!

RE: Which evaluation methods are more efficient or effective?
Vastus
26.04.16 20:03 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Peer-review seems to be one of the most popular evaluation methodologies. Indeed, if effectively organized by educational institutions, it can provide with opportunities for all educators to connect with a broader community of professionals. Nevertheless, and in order to implement it properly, some rules for what should be assessed as "good teaching" must be set. These can focus on many different aspects: From the content taught in the class, the materials and pedagogical methodologies used by the teacher or even the interactions between teachers and students.

In your opinion, which of this features should be subject for review?  

RE: Which evaluation methods are more efficient or effective?
Vastus
27.04.16 9:40 Vastusena Anonüümne'le.
I have no doubts about  the value of peer-review for improving the quality of any teaching practices, regardless of STEM, science or maths education. Considering the state of the literature on STEM teaching, I cast doubt on whether inservice teachers could give effective feedbacks about their peer's STEM teaching practices because even researchers still do not know much about what good STEM teaching looks like. The existing instructional activities are generally based on constructing physical models, which I think are just a small part of STEM education. In this regard, I feel like we need more of evidence-based evaluation strategies in this emerging field. Be more specific, what are the working instruments in evaluating STEM teaching in your country, if available?

RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef
Vastus
28.03.17 7:59 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Share your thoughts on this topic!

RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef
Vastus
15.04.17 13:18 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Share your thoughts on this topic!

RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef
Vastus
24.04.17 0:52 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Share your thoughts on this topic!

RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef
Vastus
29.04.17 23:50 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Share your thoughts on this topic!

RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef
Vastus
2.05.17 4:10 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Share your thoughts on this topic!

RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef
Vastus
21.05.17 5:09 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Share your thoughts on this topic!

RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&#
Vastus
30.05.17 19:31 Vastusena Anonüümne'le.
Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&#
Vastus
15.06.17 10:46 Vastusena Anonüümne'le.
Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef
Vastus
21.06.17 4:55 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Share your thoughts on this topic!

RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&#
Vastus
23.06.17 20:18 Vastusena Anonüümne'le.
Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&#
Vastus
25.06.17 19:00 Vastusena Anonüümne'le.
Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&#
Vastus
25.06.17 23:44 Vastusena Anonüümne'le.
Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&#
Vastus
29.06.17 20:25 Vastusena Anonüümne'le.
Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&#
Vastus
10.07.17 13:04 Vastusena Anonüümne'le.
Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

RE: RE&#x3a&#x3b;&#x20&#x3b;Which&#
Vastus
16.07.17 17:00 Vastusena Anonüümne'le.
Share&#x20&#x3b;your&#x20&#x3b;thoughts&#x20&#x3b;on&#x20&#x3b;this&#x20&#x3b;topic&#x21&#x3b;

RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef
Vastus
10.08.17 16:37 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Share your thoughts on this topic!

RE: Which evaluation methods are more ef
Vastus
11.08.17 22:55 Vastusena Radostina Karageorgieva'le.
Share your thoughts on this topic!